BOYD v. DELBASO et al
Petitioner: MAURICE BOYD
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT THERESA DELBASO
Case Number: 2:2019cv06054
Filed: December 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOSEPH F LEESON
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT #1 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE FORM SUBMITTED DID NOT INCLUDE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISONERS INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT BALANCE. IF BOYD SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH BOYD WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. BOYD MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IF HE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF BOYD FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/22/20.1/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER .(mas, ) Modified on 1/27/2020 (mas, ).
December 20, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. Mailed to pro se petitioner on 12/26/19. (kw, )
December 20, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IFP Pending), filed by PRO SE PETITIONER MAURICE BOYD. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Civil Cover Sheets, #3 Envelope)(kw, )
December 20, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED BY PRO SE PETITIONER MAURICE BOYD.(Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOYD v. DELBASO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT THERESA DELBASO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MAURICE BOYD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?