LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. v. AZAR et al
| LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. |
| ALEXANDER AZAR and SEEMA VERMA |
| 2:2020cv01850 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by United States Postal Service re: served Summons and Complaint upon Seema Verma, Administrator for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested on 04/17/2020 (RAPHAEL, KEVIN) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by United States Postal Service re: served Summons and Complaint upon Alexander Azar, Secretary United States Dept. of Health & Human Services by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested on 04/16/2020 (RAPHAEL, KEVIN) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by KEVIN E. RAPHAEL on behalf of LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. with Certificate of Service(RAPHAEL, KEVIN) |
| Summons Issued as to ALEXANDER AZAR, SEEMA VERMA. E-MAIL To: COUNSEL on 4/13/2020 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14228924.), filed by LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C..(OWENS, ALEXANDER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
