DUPREE v. WETZEL

DUPREE v. WETZEL

Case Number:	2:2020cv02392
Filed:	August 23, 2023
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 23, 2023	Filing 64 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ([DOC. NO. 44 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; THE AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [DOC. NO. ( 20 ) IS DISMISSED AND DENIED, WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEA RING; PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF IN HIS AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE TO DEFEND (DOC. NO. [54)] IS DISMISSED; PETITIONERS MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (DOC. NO. 57 ) IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; PETITIONERS MOTION FOR CERTIFIC ATE OF APPEALABILITY (DOC. NO. 58 ) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE AS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR CONCLUDING THAT REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THE COURTS DISPOSITION OR FINDINGS; PETITIONERS MOTION FOR JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 62 ) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/23/23. 8/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 23, 2023

Filing 64 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ([DOC. NO. 44 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; THE AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [DOC. NO. ( 20 ) IS DISMISSED AND DENIED, WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEA RING; PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF IN HIS AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE TO DEFEND (DOC. NO. [54)] IS DISMISSED; PETITIONERS MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (DOC. NO. 57 ) IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; PETITIONERS MOTION FOR CERTIFIC ATE OF APPEALABILITY (DOC. NO. 58 ) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE AS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR CONCLUDING THAT REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THE COURTS DISPOSITION OR FINDINGS; PETITIONERS MOTION FOR JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 62 ) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/23/23. 8/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUPREE v. WETZEL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?