CONROY v. SAUL
JENNIFER CONROY |
ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW SAUL |
2:2020cv03837 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
LYNNE A SITARSKI |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Social Security Magistrate Consent by JENNIFER CONROY.. (CAMPOLONGO, JEFFREY) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE FORM WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND FILE THE FORM AS ORDERED HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES UNDER 28 U.S.C.&636 (c); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 9/1/20. (Attachments: #1 CONSENT) 9/1/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL ) |
Filing 3 Supplemental Procedural Order 8/7/20 Entered and copies e-mailed. (jaa, ) |
Filing 2 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 consent)(jaa, ) |
Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (jaa, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14477387.), filed by JENNIFER CONROY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(CAMPOLONGO, JEFFREY) Modified on 8/7/2020 (fb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.