PRATT v. SAUL
Plaintiff: GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS and GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATT
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Case Number: 2:2020cv06176
Filed: December 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: LYNNE A SITARSKI
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Procedural Order 12/15/20 Entered and copies e-mailed. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(mbh, )
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRCP 4(i) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM (CN/ECF) UPON THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION III, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE CLERK'S OFFICE WILL ENSURE THAT CM/ECF NOTIFICATIONS INDICATING THAT THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED AND THE SUMMONSES HAVE BEEN ISSUED ARE SENT TO ogc.edpa.complaints@ssa.gov and USAPAE.SSAComplaints@usdoj.gov. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 12/14/20.12/15/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE CAPTION IN THIS MATTER BE AMENDED TO READ: GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATT, ON BEHALF OF Y.D.C.Q. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK'S OFFICE SHALL AMEND ALL DOCKET ENTRIES SO THAT THE MINOR PLAINTIFF IS IDENTIFIED AS Y.D.C.Q. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 2/14/20. 2/15/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) Modified on 12/17/2020 (tjd).
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (mbh, )
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Magistrate Consent by GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS.. (bw, )
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bw, )
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS..(bw, ) Modified on 12/9/2020 (bw, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRATT v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS
Represented By: RANIA M. MAJOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATT
Represented By: RANIA M. MAJOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?