BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
AARON I. BROWN |
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAIME SORBER and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2021cv02930 |
June 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
C DARNELL JONES |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number PPE231013 (sg, ) |
PLEADING #6 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT #1 BROWN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 8/2/21.8/2/21 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO BROWN. (fdc) |
Filing 5 MOTION filed by AARON I. BROWN.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jaa, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY MOTION BEING FILED, COUNSEL MUST NOTIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE POTENTIAL MOTION, AND THE POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF SAME, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 7/8/21. 7/8/21 ENTERED AND MAILED TO BROWN. (fdc) |
COPY OF PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, BROWN. (bw, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. (fdc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAIME SORBER, filed by AARON I. BROWN. (IFP PENDING) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(fdc) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by AARON I. BROWN.(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.