CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| 2:2022cv04748 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8. THE PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN MARCH 27, 2024. THE DE FENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE PLAINTIFF FAILED TO ADHERE TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8, AND HIS COMPLAINT IS BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED AS TO FEDERAL RULE CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) IN THAT THE COURT HAS AFFORDED THE PLAINTIFF AN OPPORTUNITY TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE KAI N. SCOTT ON 2/27/24. 2/27/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
