HENDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
| SHAQUILLE HENDERSON |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2023cv00202 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Letter dated 3/1/23 Re: Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(sbt)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter dated 2-27-23 by SHAQUILLE HENDERSON (sbt)
|
|
Filing 5
Copy of Order/Notice dated 2/2/23 (Document # 3) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to Shaquille Henderson for the following reason: Refused/Unable to Forward. (resent to pro se with proper address) (dt)
|
|
Filing 4
Copy of Order/Notice dated 1/11/23 (Document # 2) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to SHAQUILLE HENDERSON for the following reason: RETURN TO SENDER - REFUSED - MISSING INMATE NO.. (er)
|
|
Mailed Pro Se Guidelines to Pro Se to address with inmate no. (er)
|
|
IFP Application and 2254 Habeas Corpus Petition mailed to: SHAQUILLE HENDERSON. (DT)
|
|
Document # 3 Mailed to Pro Se: SHAQUILLE HENDERSON. (DT)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PETITIONER HAVING FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2254 WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEE OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND FURTHER RECOGNIZING THAT LRCP 9.3 OBLIGATES HABEAS PETITIONERS TO USE THIS COURTS STANDARD FORM, A BLANK COPY OF THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION 2254 ALONG WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO PETITIONER. IF PETITIONER SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, PETITIONER MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. PETITIONER SHALL ALSO COMPLETE THE PETITION FORM, SIGN AND RETURN TO THE COURT. IF PETITIONER FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE PETITION MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 2/2/23. 2/2/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PETITIONER.(jaa, )
|
|
Document #2 Mailed to: SHAQUILLE HENDERSON. (DT)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAQUILLE HENDERSON. Envelope. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP. (va) Modified on 1/20/2023 (md).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HENDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SHAQUILLE HENDERSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
