COLLAZO v. ROSENTHAL et al
| WILLIAM LAPORTE COLLAZO |
| BRIAN D. ROSENTHAL, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. CHESTER and CCHA, S.C.I. CHESTER |
| 2:2023cv03475 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by WILLIAM LAPORTE COLLAZO..(fdc)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Copies/Service filed by WILLIAM LAPORTE COLLAZO.(fdc)
|
|
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 WITH IFP FORMS ON 9/12/23. (jaa, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT IF MR. COLLAZO SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/11/23. 9/11/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO COLLAZO.(fdc)
|
|
COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw)
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. NOT MAILED TO COLLAZO. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WILLIAM LAPORTE COLLAZO. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CCHA, S.C.I. CHESTER, BRIAN D. ROSENTHAL, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. CHESTER, filed by WILLIAM LAPORTE COLLAZO. *IFP NOT FILED/FILING FEE NOT PAID* (fdc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
