EPPENSTEIN et al v. BERKS PRODUCTS CORP. et al
Plaintiff: JIM EPPENSTEIN and DEBORAH EPPENSTEIN
Defendant: BERKS PRODUCTS CORP., EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, BERKS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MUHLENBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT and MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY
Case Number: 5:2015cv02188
Filed: April 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Berks
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G. SMITH
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 6972
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION/ORDER THAT THE OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 25, 26, 27, 42) ARE GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, AND DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 11/6/15. 11/6/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EPPENSTEIN et al v. BERKS PRODUCTS CORP. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JIM EPPENSTEIN
Represented By: GLENN A. ELLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEBORAH EPPENSTEIN
Represented By: GLENN A. ELLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERKS PRODUCTS CORP.
Represented By: TIMOTHY J. BERGERE
Represented By: JENNIFER E. CANFIELD
Represented By: RONALD E. HURST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
Represented By: LOUIS S. CHIAPPETTA
Represented By: ANTHONY WARNER CLARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERKS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Represented By: MATTHEW J. CONNELL
Represented By: CHARLES R. STARNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUHLENBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY
Represented By: SCOTT A. GOULD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?