BURNO v. WETZEL et al
JUNIUS BURNO |
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARIROSA LAMAS |
5:2015cv06307 |
November 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lehigh |
GERALD J. PAPPERT |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT BURNO'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AMEND IS DENIED. BURNO'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED. NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE; AND THE CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/2/21. 8/2/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO BURNO. (fdc) |
Filing 93 ORDER THAT BURNO'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AMEND IS DENIED; BURNO'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE; & THE CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/22/19. 11/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO THE COURT'S STAY AND ABEY ORDER AND HAZEL-ATLAS MOTION (DOC. NO. 20) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MAIL PETITIONER A COPY OF RESPONDENTS MEMORANDUM OF LAW (DOC. NO. 15). SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/29/16. 9/30/16 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND MEMORANDUM MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.