SCARBOROUGH v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
| E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III |
| COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 5:2018cv02436 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Bucks |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER OF 8/1/23 THAT PER THE MEMORANDUM OPINION FILED THIS DATE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER AND AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(e) (DOC. 26) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/1/23. 8/1/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER THAT 1. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO VACATE A JUDGEMENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD ON THE COURT UNDER F.R.C.P. 60(D)(3), FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR LEAVE T O FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT" (DOCKET NO. 17) IS DENIED; AND 2. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 55(B)(2)" (DOCKET NO. 19) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/7/22. 9/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 5 MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/14/19. 6/14/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
