ALI et al v. SPONUGLE et al

ALI et al v. SPONUGLE et al

Case Number:	5:2018cv05655
Filed:	May 30, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 30, 2019	Filing 48 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS HOWARD F. KNISELY, DAVID MILLER, MARY MONGIOVI SPONAUGLE, ECF NO. 5 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, DAVID MILLER, MARK J. WILSON, BRETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 17 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM BY DEFENDANTS MARK SHIVERS, OFFICER SNYDER, AND TOM RUDZINSKI, ECF NO. 33 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 4 , IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, MARK J. WILSON, B RETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 34 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS HOWARD F. KNISELY, DAVID MILLER, AND MARY MONGIOVI SPONAUGLE, ECF NO. 36 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 28 , IS STRICKEN. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, MARK J. WILSON, BRETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 44 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 38 , IS STRICKEN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 5/29/19. 5/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 30, 2019

Filing 48 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS HOWARD F. KNISELY, DAVID MILLER, MARY MONGIOVI SPONAUGLE, ECF NO. 5 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, DAVID MILLER, MARK J. WILSON, BRETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 17 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM BY DEFENDANTS MARK SHIVERS, OFFICER SNYDER, AND TOM RUDZINSKI, ECF NO. 33 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 4 , IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, MARK J. WILSON, B RETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 34 , IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS HOWARD F. KNISELY, DAVID MILLER, AND MARY MONGIOVI SPONAUGLE, ECF NO. 36 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 28 , IS STRICKEN. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CRAIG W. STEDMAN, CAITLIN BLAZIER, ALAN BLANK, MARK J. WILSON, BRETT I. COLE, TERI LANDON-MILLER, AND ANDREW WAGNER, ECF NO. 44 , IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 38 , IS STRICKEN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 5/29/19. 5/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALI et al v. SPONUGLE et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?