ACOSTA v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST et al
| JAIME ACOSTA |
| THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST |
| 5:2020cv01305 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| LYNNE A SITARSKI |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Receipt of State Court Record on 4/15/20, sent from CLERKS OFFICE to CHAMBERS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI. (jpd, )
|
|
State Court Record received on 4/14/20 from the C.C.P of Berks County and palced in Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski Mail Box. (jpd, )
|
|
Prisoner State Court Record placed in the Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski Mail Bin by Steve Tomas. (jpd, )
|
|
Filing 7
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Answer to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, REquesting Denial of the Writ by THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Answer, #2 Appendix Appendix Part 1, #3 Appendix Apendix Part 2, #4 Appendix Appendix Part 3, #5 Appendix Index to Appendix)(KELECIC, KENNETH) Modified on 4/14/2020 (tjd).
|
|
Filing 6
Praecipe for Entry of Appearance with Certificate of Service by THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS. (KELECIC, KENNETH) Modified on 4/14/2020 (tjd).
|
|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER BY 4/13/2020. THE PROTHONOTARY OF BERKS/CLERK OF COURTS OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF BERKS COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. JAMIE MONTE ACOSTA, CP-06-CR-0004038-2014, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY, PA BY 4/13/2020. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 3/13/2020. 3/16/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. COPIES TO ATTORNEY GENERAL, CCP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (sg, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE IFP APPLICATION (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DENIED BECAUSE THE PETITIONER PAID THE REQUIRED $5.00 FILING FEE; THIS MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE LYNNE A. SITARSKI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; PER LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND THAT NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF BERKS COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE HABEAS PETITION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER INTO CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF COURT 3/12/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT OF ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF BERKS COUNTY.(mas, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mbh, )
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABES CORPUS (Filing fee $5 receipt number PPE212574) filed by JAIME ACOSTA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D, #2 Exhibits E-G)(mbh, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/11/2020: #3 Envelope) (mbh, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/11/2020) (mbh, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/11/2020: #4 Coversheets) (mbh, ).
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS FILED BY JAIME ACOSTA.(mbh, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/11/2020: #1 Envelope) (mbh, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
