SCHEID v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
JASON C. SCHEID |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
5:2022cv00207 |
January 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARILYN HEFFLEY |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Social Security Administrative Record . (Attachments: #1 Appendix Court transcript index, #2 Appendix Documents related to administrative process including transcript of oral hearing, if applicable, #3 Appendix Payment documents and decisions, #4 Appendix Jurisdictional documents and notices, #5 Appendix Non disability related development, #6 Appendix Disability related development, #7 Appendix Medical Records)(LYNCH, ANDREW) |
Filing 7 Social Security Magistrate Consent by JASON C. SCHEID.. (HALL, JAMIE) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL THE FORM WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND FILE THE FORM AS ORDERED HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES UNDER 28 U.S.C. &636 (c); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 3/1/22. (Attachments: #1 CONSENT) 3/1/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED. (JL) |
Filing 5 Procedural Order together with Supplemental Orders 1/19/22 Entered and copies e-mailed. (JL) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(i) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM ("CM/ECF"); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 1/19/22.1/19/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment. (Attachments: #1 notice of consent to magistrate)(dt) |
Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (JL ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JASON C. SCHEID.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(HALL, JAMIE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by JASON C. SCHEID. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 USM-285 Form, #6 USM-285 Form, #7 USM-285 Form, #8 Case Management Tracking Form, #9 Designation Form)(HALL, JAMIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SCHEID v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JASON C. SCHEID | |
Represented By: | JAMIE RYAN HALL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
Represented By: | ANDREW C. LYNCH |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.