STOKES v. CAMPBELL et al
| GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR. |
| ERIC CAMPBELL, ASHLEIGH KILNER, JUAN BARRIOS, SCOTT ACHEY, THOMAS DIMAGGIO, DERRICK CARGILL and STEVEN POTYNSKI |
| 5:2022cv02681 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF, RE: #7 Request for Waiver of Service (mas)
|
|
Filing 7
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to DEFENDANTS on 8/31/22. Waiver of Service due by 9/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 WAIVER, #2 WAIVER, #3 WAIVER, #4 WAIVER, #5 WAIVER, #6 WAIVER, #7 WAIVER)(mas)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR. #0022855, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. STOKESS OFFICIAL CAPACITY CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS ERIC CAMPBELL, ASHLEIGH KILNER, JUAN BARRIOS, SCOTT ACHEY, THOMAS DIMAGGIO, DERRICK CARGILL, AND STEVEN POTYNSKI ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II), BUT STOKES MAY PROCEED AT THIS TIME AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES. THE CLERK OF COURT IS SPECIALLY APPOINTED TO SERVE WRITTEN WAIVER REQUESTS ON THE DEFENDANTS, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(D), TO EFFECT WAIVER OF SERVICE; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 8/24/22. 8/24/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR. *ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (rf, )
|
|
DOC 4 MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT STOKESS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. #1 ) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF STOKES SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE SHALL, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM JANUARY 5, 2022 THROUGH JULY 5, 2022. ALTERNATIVELY, HE CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF STOKES IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. HE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE RETURN OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE FEE. IF STOKES FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 7/18/22.7/18/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas) Modified on 7/18/2022 (mas).
|
|
Copy of Doc. 3 mailed to Pro Se. (mas)
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against SCOTT ACHEY, JUAN BARRIOS, ERIC CAMPBELL, DERRICK CARGILL, THOMAS DIMAGGIO, ASHLEIGH KILNER, STEVEN POTYNSKI, filed by GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR. NO FEE PAID. IFP PENDING. ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (mas)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR. (mas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
