RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
DAVID RODRIGUEZ |
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
5:2023cv00177 |
January 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
SCOTT W REID |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF BRYAN KONOSKI, ESQ. TO PROCEED PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT W. REID ON 2/15/23.2/15/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Filing 10 Notice Consenting Magistrate Consent by DAVID RODRIGUEZ.(SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Filing 9 Social Security Magistrate Consent by DAVID RODRIGUEZ.. (SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Bryan Konoski by DAVID RODRIGUEZ. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16501177.). (SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Pro Hac Vice filed by DAVID RODRIGUEZ..(SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Filing 6 Designation Form filed by DAVID RODRIGUEZ.(SEITZINGER, WILBUR) Modified on 2/16/2023 (lisad, ). |
Filing 5 Procedural Order together with Supplemental Orders 2/9/23 Entered and copies e-mailed. (JL) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(i) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA (CM/ECF); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT W. REID ON 2/9/23.2/9/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Service made electronically as to the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (JL) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSTENT TO PROCEED TO MAGISTRATE)(dt) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Rodriguez.Motion.(SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Rodriguez, filed by David Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(SEITZINGER, WILBUR) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section is incomplete. A signature is required. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAVID RODRIGUEZ | |
Represented By: | WILBUR H. SEITZINGER, JR. |
Represented By: | BRYAN KONOSKI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.