BEY v. FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC. ET AL.
KEVIN ORSON CHARLES DEY BEY |
FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC. and FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC |
5:2023cv00920 |
March 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Filing fee: $ 190.50, receipt number 200008745 (Attachments: #1 Receipt Letter)(va) |
Filing 16 Letter Request for Documents, by KEVIN ORSON CHARLES DEY BEY. No Envelope. (Attachments: #1 Response) (va) |
PAPER #15 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 15 ORDER THAT MR. BEYS MOTION CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD (DOC. NO. #1 -2) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/30/23. 3/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas) |
Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH: Show Cause Hearing held on 3/29/23. The Court DENIES plaintiff's motion to confirm arbitration award. Order to follow. Court Reporter: ESR. (er) |
Filing 13 EXHIBIT filed by KEVIN ORSON CHARLES DEY BEY. (mas) (mas). |
Filing 12 Response re #10 Response to Order to Show Cause, Notice of Fact by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (GISLESON, JOHN) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by KEVIN ORSON HARLES DEY BEY. RE: Violation Warning Denial of Rights Under Color of Law. (IN PERSON FILING)(dt) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF FACT BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF KEVIN ORSON CHARLES DEY BEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A to G, #2 Exhibit Exhibit H, #3 Exhibit Exhibit I, #4 Exhibit Exhibit J & K, #5 Exhibit Exhibit L, #6 Exhibit Exhibit M)(IN PERSON FILING) (dt) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(GISLESON, JOHN) |
Filing 8 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of LEHIGH County. (JL) |
Filing 7 ORDER THAT BEY SHALL SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DENY HIS MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (DOC. NO. #1 - #2 ) AND VACATE THE PURPORTED ARBITRATION AWARD SEEMINGLY ENTERED BY AMERICAN ARBITRATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO BEYS MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD; BEY SHALL HAVE UNTIL NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2023, TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITH THE CLERK OF COURT; IF FIDELITY DESIRES TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH ITS POSITION REGARDING THE POTENTIAL DENIAL OF THE MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND VACATUR OF THE PURPORTED ARBITRATION AWARD, IT SHALL FILE ANY WRITTEN SUBMISSION NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2023; IF BEY DOES NOT TIMELY FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL INTERPRET THIS FAILURE AS BEYS LACK OF OPPOSITION TO THE COURT DENYING HIS MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND VACATING THE ARBITRATION AWARD PURPORTEDLY ENTERED BY AMERICAN ARBITRATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES; THE COURT WILL HOLD A HEARING ON THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 2023, AT 3:00 P.M., AT THE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, THE HOLMES BUILDING, 101 LARRY HOLMES DRIVE, 4TH FLOOR, EASTON, PENNSYLVANIA 18042; BEY IS DIRECTED TO PERSONALLY/PHYSICALLY APPEAR FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED IN PARAGRAPH 5 OF THIS ORDER; AND IF BEY DOES NOT APPEAR FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED IN PARAGRAPH 5 OF THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL INTERPRET THIS FAILURE AS BEYS LACK OF OPPOSITION TO THE COURT DENYING HIS MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND VACATING THE ARBITRATION AWARD PURPORTEDLY ENTERED BY AMERICAN ARBITRATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/14/23. 3/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/14/23. 3/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to ( RESPONSES DUE BY 3/28/2023.), Set/Reset Hearings:( SHOW CAUSE HEARING SET FOR 3/29/2023 03:00 PM IN Easton 4th Floor BEFORE HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH.) (mas) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth J. M. Hood on behalf of FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC. with Certificate of Service(Hood, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal (Attorney), Updated Civil Cover Sheet and Designation Form (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(GISLESON, JOHN) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Defendant's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED CIVIL COVER SHEET AND DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Civil Cover Sheet is missing a signature. Designation Form's Related Case section is incomplete. The Yes/No questions need to be answered. (sbt) |
Pro Se Guidelines Mailed on 3/10/23. (sbt) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Fidelity Global Brokerage Group, Inc. by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC., ET AL..(GISLESON, JOHN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC., ET AL. Lower Court: Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County | No. 2023-C-0549 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16551539), filed by FIDELITY INVESTMENT LLC., ET AL.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Designation Form)(GISLESON, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.