Deyo v. Eck et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Francis Deyo
Defendant: Phillip R. Eck and Manor Township Police
Case Number: 5:2023cv01658
Filed: April 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G SMITH
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #16 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT; THE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. NO. #18 ) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE; THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING (DOC. NO. #19 ) IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. #20 ) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEYO FILING A SEPARATE HABEAS PETITION ON THE PROPER FORM; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND THE PLAINTIFF A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A HABEAS CORPUS PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241.4 THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER ON THE BLANK COPY MAILED TO THE PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/7/23.6/7/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH BLANK HABEAS CORPUS PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 FORM AND UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mas) Modified on 6/7/2023 (mas).
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION for Writ OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nicholas Francis Deyo. (amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 LETTER EXHIBITS FILED BY Nicholas Francis Deyo.. (amas)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #10 ) IS GRANTED, AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO (DEYO), #2-2 3089, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B), REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED AS FOLLOWS; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TERMINATE THE MANOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND DEYO A BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/5/23. 6/5/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER .(mas) Modified on 6/5/2023 (mas).
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/5/23. 6/5/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas)
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order COPY OF DOC. NO. 12 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw)
May 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF 5/26/23 THAT AFTER CONSIDERING THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FILED BY THE PRO SE PLAINTIFF, NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO ("DEYO") (DOC. NO. 9), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION (DOC. NO. 9) IS DENIED. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH ON 5/26/23. 5/26/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF) Modified on 5/26/2023 (dt).
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nicholas Francis Deyo. (amas)
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(amas)
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF 5/4/23 THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING SUBMITTED COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, PLAINTIFF MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 5/4/23. 5/4/23 ENTERED. (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Doc. 8 and IFP Application mailed to pro se. (er)
May 3, 2023 Opinion or Order PAPER #7 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL)
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt)
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 1:23-cv-00689. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) that this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 27, 2023. (kjn) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/2/2023.]
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) AND ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo - We will order that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 27, 2023. (kjn) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/2/2023.]
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER issued and sent to Plaintiff. (aaa) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/2/2023.]
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (aaa) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/2/2023.]
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Nicholas Francis Deyo.(aaa) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/2/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deyo v. Eck et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Francis Deyo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip R. Eck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manor Township Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?