HESTER-CARRILLO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO |
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, GOVENOR JOSH SHAPIRO and ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHELLE HENRY |
5:2023cv02134 |
June 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter dated 7/21/23 Re: Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(sbt) |
Filing 6 Letter dated 7/19/23 by SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO (sbt) |
Filing 5 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO. (mas) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1), IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND THE PLAINTIFF AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION FOR LEAVE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/14/23. 6/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED WITH IFP TO PRO SE. (er) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHELLE HENRY, JOSH SHAPIRO, filed by SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mas) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/6/2023) (mas). Modified on 6/6/2023 (mas). Modified on 6/6/2023 (lisad, ). |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO. (mas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.