Shafik et al v. Curran
Ryan Shafik, Rockwood Strategies, LP and Andrew Emerick |
John F. Curran |
1:2009cv02469 |
December 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Cumberland |
Yvette Kane |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re Currans Rule 60(b)(3) motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 28, 2013. (kjn) |
Filing 74 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It will be ordered that the Clerk enter judgment infavor of the plaintiff Rockwood Strategies, LP, and against thedefendant, on Count I, in the amount of $28,000 and in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff Shafik on Counts II and III. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser on 8/16/11. (rc) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by John F. Curran is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1)Dfts mtn to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction i s granted as to all clms brought against him by pltf Emerick; 2)Dfts mtn to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted as to the defamation claim brought by Pltf Shafik; 3)In all other respects the motion is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 16, 2010. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.