USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Metropolitan Edison Company
Plaintiff: USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant: Metropolitan Edison Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv01178
Filed: June 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER denying Met-Ed's motion for reconsideration 91 of ct's memo & order 89 & 90 & denying request for certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 USC 1292(b). (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/21/14. (ki)
August 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER (Memorandum 94 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING Schneider's motion in limine 77 , GRANTING in part & DENYING in part Schneider's MSJ 61 - granted w/ re: Met-Ed's negligence claim & denied w/ re: Met-Ed's strict liability claim, & noting revised scheduling order for trial to issue by future order of ct. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/12/14. (ki)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER (Memorandum 89 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Met-Ed's motion in limine 56 is DENIED.; 2. Met-Ed's MSJ 58 is DENIED. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/16/14. (ki)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER denying USAA's motion to strike 65 the motion in limine 56 & MSJ 58 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/4/14. (ki)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting plaintiff USAA Casualty's motion 40 to strike 3rd-party complaint of deft Med Ed as to deft Joan Sonnen. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 5/31/13. (ki)
January 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Methvin 23 , DENYING deft's motion to dismiss 14 , & noting pretrial/trial order to issue by separate order. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 1/10/13. (ki)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts shall respond to amended complaint in acc w/ FRCP.; 2. Motion to dismiss complaint 7 DENIED as MOOT w/out prejudice. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/22/12. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Metropolitan Edison Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Erick J. Kirker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Edison Company
Represented By: Charles E. Wasilefski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?