RODRIGUEZ v. HARLOW et al
| Santos Ramos Rodriguez |
| The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and Michael W. Harlow |
| 1:2013cv00107 |
| January 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Outside State |
| William W. Caldwell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ACCORDINGLY, this 20th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 5 , filed January 18, 2013, to which objections were filed, and upon independent re view of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judges report is adopted (Doc. 5). 2. Petitoners objection 6 is overruled. 3. Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed. 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file. 4 1 (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 2/20/13. (am)
|
|
Filing
3
OPINION AND ORDER that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania FORTHWITH. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/14/13. (lrw)[Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 1/15/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
