Manning v. Ross et al
Eugene Douglas Manning |
Pamela D Ross, Douglas Strickland, David Rush, Summit Dermatology Chambersburg Hospital, David Arnold, Orion Hippensteel, Robert Peterson, Robert Johnson, Norman Epstein and Satyajit Mukherjee |
1:2013cv00831 |
April 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Franklin |
Thomas M. Blewitt |
John E. Jones |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED in its entirety.2. Plaintiffs claim for monetary damages against Defendants in their official capacities is DISMIS SED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Defendants Ross, Mukherjee, Epstein and Summit Health Chambersburg Hospital are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE fromthis action. 4. Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment false arrest claim is DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment due process claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 6. Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment unreasonable search and seizure claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 7 Plaintiffs First Amendment malicious prosecution claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.8. This action shall be remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for furtherpre-trial management. (eo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.