Hagan v. Harris et al
Damont Hagan |
Brian Harris, Charles Mitchell, Pope, Richard Goss, Linda Lane, Dolphin, Swisher, James Harrington, Mark Dembart, Marsh and John Wetzel |
1:2013cv02731 |
November 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Huntingdon |
EC |
Christopher C. Conner |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 173 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re: defendant Dolphins motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 12, 2016. (kjn) |
Filing 164 MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the motion to seal Exhibit A to Doc. 154 (Doc. 155 ) is GRANTED and that exhibit is hereby SEALED, pending further order of court. Motion to Stay 161 is also GRANTED. Motion to correct errata 160 is also GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on December 23, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 142 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 120 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Damont Hagan, 122 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Damont Hagan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 16, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 MOTION to Compel filed by Damont Hagan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 1, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 108 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 105 MOTION to Withdraw defendant James Harrington from this case filed by Damont Hagan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 29, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM ORDER re: 94 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Damont Hagan - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. If the defendants have copies of the grievances and staff requests that the p laintiff is seeking in the plaintiffs fourth request for the production of documents (Doc. 95, Ex. Z-7), they shall provide copies to the plaintiff within 14 days from the date of this Order. 2. If the defendants are in possession of progress notes o r documents shared between Defendants Swisher and Marsh regarding the alleged decision to remove a medical diagnosis that had previously been assigned to Hagan (Doc. 95, Ex. Z-5), they shall provide copies to the plaintiff within 14 days from the dat e of this Order.3. To the extent Hagan seeks to review his medical file, the defendants haverepresented that they make it available to him, and that Hagan will be able to make copies of documents in that file at his own expense. To the extent Hagan wishes to conduct such a review, he shall notify defendants counsel who shall work with officials at SCI-Huntingdon to facilitate this review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 18, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 82 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 66 MOTION to Compel filed by Damont Hagan. The plaintiffs motion to compel, is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part, as follows: On or before April 17, 2015, we direct the defendants to provide to the court fo r its in camera inspection all disputed documents, including records contained among Hagans medical records which allegedly describes Hagan as a security risk due to his focus on litigation. Armed with this information the court can determine: (1) wh ether this information is relevant to the issues raised in this case; (2) whether it is subject to any valid claim of privilege recognized by the Federal Rules; and (3) to what extent, in what format, and under what conditions it may be released to theplaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 1, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 60 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Damont Hagan.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 20, 2015. (kjn) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 44 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by David Swisher, James Harrington, John Wetzel, Robert Marsh, 29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Quentin Dolphin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 15, 2014. (kjn) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM ORRDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The plaintiffs request for leave to file a second amended complaint is GRANTED. 2. The defendants motions to dismiss the first amended complaint (Docs. 20, 22) are DENIED as moot, without prejudice t o their right to file renewed motions to dismiss the second amended complaint. 3. The defendants motion to strike the second amended complaint (Doc. 30) is DENIED. 4. The plaintiffs motion to moot Defendant Dolphins pending motion to dismiss the seco nd amended complaint (Doc. 33) is DENIED. 5. The plaintiff shall file a brief in response to Defendant Dolphins motion to dismiss the second amended complaint within 14 days of receiving a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 21, 2014. (kjn) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying pltf's motion for judicial notice 12 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/22/14. (ki) |
Filing 8 ORDER (memorandum 7 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf shall file amended complaint by 12/30/13.; 2. Amended complaint to contain same case number.... (see order for specifics).; 3. Pltf cautioned that i nc of separate, unrelated claims will be considered failure to coplay & will result in dismissal of complaint.; 4. Failure to file amended complaint w/in specified time period to result in dismissal of action..; 5. Clrk of Ct to rwd to pltf Notice, Consent & Ref of Civ Action to MJ form & pltf to notify ct if he consents to jurisdiction of MJ when filing amended complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/10/13. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.