Stuart v. Lisiak et al
| Lawrence Stuart |
| Lisiak, Tony Inuzzi, Karen Holly, John Kerestes, Donna Varner, M. Kranch, B. Coogan, Juan DeRojas and John Steinhart |
| 1:2014cv01401 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Schuylkill |
| CA |
| John E. Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The Corrections Defendants motion (Doc. 26) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety with res pect to these Defendants. 2. The motion (Doc. 28) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 filed by Defendants Coogan, Ianuzzi, Kranch and Lisiak is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. The motion to dismiss is DENIED.b. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. c. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Coogan, Ianuzzi, Kranch and Lisi ak and against Plaintiff. 3. The complaint against Defendant DeRojas is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5. Any appeal form this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
