Angino et al v. Santander Bank, N.A.
| Richard C. Angino and Alice K. Angino |
| Santander Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2015cv00438 |
| March 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Anginos' objs 56 SUSTAINED to limited extent ct orders into paras of R&R 35 @ 1-2 of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson to be STRICKEN w/ Anginos' objs otherwise overruled; 2. ADOPTING Chief Magi strate Judge Carlson's REPORT 35 as modified by Para 1.; 3. GRANTING Santander's MTD 14 & DISMISSING Anginos' complaint 1 as follows... (see Paras 3a & 3b for specifics).; 4. Granting Anginos leave to amend pleading w/in 20 days of date of this order consistent w/ Para 3 above & report 35 of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson - in absence of timely filed amended complaint Cts II & III will be dismissed w/ prejudice & Clrk of Ct will be directed to close case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/2/16. (ki)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 28 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Santander Bank, N.A.., Case stayed pending resolution of the outstanding motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 30, 2015. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
