Pride Mobility Products Corp. v. Dylewski
| Pride Mobility Products Corp. |
| Bryan Dylewski |
| 3:2008cv00231 |
| February 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bank Rome LLP's renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/12/11. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 108 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/25/09 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 78) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: (A) Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim for breach of Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement against Defendant Bryan Dylewski, Defendant Teresa M. Ward, and Defendant John Ward. (B) Plainti ff's Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract against Defendant Mobility Products Unlimited, LLC. (C) Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED as to the amount of damages owed by Defendant Bryan Dylewski, Defendant Theresa M. Ward, and Defendant John Ward for breach of the Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement. (2) Defendant Bryan Dylewski's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 81) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/16/09 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Mobility Products Unlimited, LLC and John Ward's Motion to Dismiss the Third Party Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) & (6), (Doc. 29), as joined by Thomas Donahue (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. (A) Counts I and II of Bryan Dylewski's Third Party Complaint (Doc. 8) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to Mobility Products and John Ward. (B) Counts V, VI, and VII of Dylewski's Third Party Complaint ( Doc. 8) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to Mobility Products, John Ward, and Thomas Donahue. (2) Third Party Defendant Invacare Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) & (6) (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. (A) Counts I, II, III, IV, and V of Bryan Dylewski's Third Party Complaint (Doc. 8) are DISMISSED with respect to Invacare Corporation. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/27/09. (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pride Mobility Products Corp. v. Dylewski | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pride Mobility Products Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth D. Snover |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bryan Dylewski | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
