Stafford v. Derose et al
| Deon C. Stafford, Sr. |
| Domenick Derose, Lenny Carrol, Tuttle, Fred Wright, Shollinghammer, Weikel, Lucas, Krenzel, Clues, John Fuller, Henson, Tom Toolin, Lutz and Taylor |
| 3:2009cv00346 |
| February 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Dauphin |
| JV |
| Thomas I. Vanaskie |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/1/15. Defendants motion for sanctions (doc 181) is granted; Plaintiff's motion to strike (doc 175) is dismissed as moot; final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff; clerk directed to close the case file. (lg)
|
|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER,1. Remaining Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc.112) is Granted. 2. Summary judgmnet is granted with respect to Plaintiff's claims regarding the conditions of his confinement. 3. The Plaintiff's c laims that: 1. Defendants Lucas and Tuttle subjected Stafford to an excessive use of force; (2) (3) Defendant Wright issued Stafford a retaliatory baseless misconduct charge and (4) denial of access to the courts Will Proceed. 4. A status conference regarding Plaintiff's surviving claims will be scheduled.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/8/13. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
