UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Goldstein et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Philip A. Goldstein and Sharon A. Goldstein |
| 3:2011cv02177 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Plaintiff United States of Americas Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) is GRANTED.(2)The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Plaintiff United States of America and against Defendants Philip A. Goldstein and Sharon A. Goldstein on Count I of the Complaint (Doc. 1) in the amount of $288,138.75, plus interest that has accrued thereon from October 8, 2012, plus interest a ccruing from the date of judgment until paid.(3)The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Plaintiff United States of America and against Defendant Philip A. Goldstein on Count II of the Complaint (Doc. 1) in the amount of $264,443.48, plus interest that has accrued thereon from October 8, 2012, plus interest accruing from the date of judgment until paid. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/21/12. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
