Seamans et al v. Tramontana et al
Sandra Seamans and Fred Seamans |
Ean Holdings LLC, Andrew B. Tramontana and Universal Technical Institute of Arizona, Inc. |
3:2013cv00698 |
March 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Susquehanna |
Malachy E Mannion |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The defendants motion in limine to strike the plaintiffs accident reconstructionists expert testimony, (Doc. 45), is DENIED;(2)The plaintiffs motion in limine to exclude any evidence regarding Mrs. Seamenss diagnosis and treatment for lesions on her liver, (Doc. 47), is GRANTED.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/3/14. (bs) |
Filing 27 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1)Defendants motions for a more definitive statement are DENIED.2)Defendants motions to strike are DENIED.3)Defendants Andrew Tramontanas and Universal Technical Institute of Arizonas moti ons to dismiss are DENIED.4)Defendant EAN Holdings motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART as to any claim for punitive damages arising through vicarious liability for Defendant Tramontanas actions and DENIED IN PART as to direct liability for punitive damages by entrusting a motor vehicle to Defendant Tramontana. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/22/13. (bs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.