Davis v. Jordan

Plaintiff: Willie L Davis
Defendant: Angelo J Jordan
Case Number: 3:2013cv01107
Filed: April 26, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Scranton Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 28, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson; Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 7) are OVERRULED. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed. Amended Complaint shall be filed by 7/12/13.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/28/13. (bg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie L Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angelo J Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.