Lamac v. Westfall Township et al
William Lamac |
Westfall Township and Lester J. Buchanan |
3:2013cv01338 |
May 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Pike |
Robert D. Mariani |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 98) are OVERRULED. 2. Defendants' Objections, (Doc. 94), are OVERRULED. 3. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 92), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated both therein and in this Court's accompanying memora ndum opinion. 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety with respect to the claims against Defendant Westfall Township, including Plaintiffs state law claims. 5. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in its entirety with respect to the claims against Defendant Buchanan. 6. Judgment is entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Westfall Township and AGAINST Plaintiff William Lamac. 7. A telephone scheduling conference SHALL BE CONDUCTED on Monday, July 25, 201 6, at 4:00 p.m. for purposes of scheduling this matter for trial. Counsel for the Plaintiff is responsible for arranging the call to Chambers at (570) 2075750 and all participants should be prepared to proceed before the undersigned is contacted. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/20/16. (jfg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.