Kimes v. Universtiy of Scranton
Plaintiff: Lisa Kimes
Defendant: Universtiy of Scranton
Case Number: 3:2014cv00091
Filed: January 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/1/16. (lg)
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: In accordance with the MEMORANDUM filed previously as ECF No. 56, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, to the extent that Ms. Kimes' Title VII and PHRA clai ms relating to a hostile work environment are dismissed. Count III alleging violations of the Whistleblower Law is dismissed. All other claims remain without modification, with the exception of Count I, which is modified as described in the accompanying Memorandum. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/25/15. (km)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, that:1. Plaintiff will be given fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, or un til Monday, March 10, 2015, to produce copies of her resume, disciplinary file from Marywood University, and formal offer letter to Defendant, or alternatively, to inform Defendant if she is not in possession of such documents;2. In the event Plainti ff is unable to, or refuses to provide the information sought within the proposed timeframe, Defendant shall revise the proposed subpoena language to be narrowly tailored to request only the aforementioned documents. If Plaintiff has further objections to the revised subpoena, her counsel should contact this Court via phone to arrange a teleconference with both parties to revisit this issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 2/24/2015. (cw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kimes v. Universtiy of Scranton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Kimes
Represented By: JEREMY M. CERUTTI
Represented By: Ari R. Karpf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Universtiy of Scranton
Represented By: Nancy Conrad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?