Pilchesky v. Federal Marshal's Office of the United States et al
| Joseph W Pilchesky |
| Federal Marshal's Office of the United States, Federal Marshal John Doe #1, Federal Marshal John Doe #2, Federal Marshal jane Doe #1 and Federal Marshal jane Doe #2 |
| 3:2014cv00381 |
| March 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),1.The report and recommendation of Judge Carlson, (Doc. 99), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.2.Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 84) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff.3.Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 85) is DENIED. 4.Plaintiffs objections to the report (Doc. 100) are OVERRULED.5.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. ORDER TERMINATING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/31/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM ORDER re: 78 MOTION for Contempt MOTION for Sanctions filed by Joseph W Pilchesky. Since these defendants have replied to these discovery demands, Pilcheskys request for discovery sanctions is now moot, and this motion for sanctions (Doc. 78.), will be DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 1, 2017. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 67 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Joseph W Pilchesky. The plaintiffs motion to compel, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on December 7, 2016. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM ORDER deeming 64 MOTION to Compel MOTION for Extension of Time to to File Pltf's Brief in Opposition to Defts' Motion to Dismiss filed by Joseph W Pilchesky as withdrawn and DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 5, 2016. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - AND NOW this 24th day of June 2015, the plaintiffs motions to reconsider (Docs. 38 and 39.) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent that the plaintiff believes that he needs further discovery to respond to this motion, in lieu of conducting additional discovery at this time, he should follow the procedures outlined in Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SEE MEMO & ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 24, 2015. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ORDER - The plaintiffs motions to compel (Docs. 35 and 36 .) are DENIED without prejudice to renewal of these motions upon resolution of the pending motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment on or before May 25, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 12, 2015. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM ORDER RE: 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust filed by Martin Payne, 21 MOTION to Substitute Party on Plaintiff's Counts of Invasion of Privacy, Intrusion upon Seclusion and Trespassing fil ed by Martin Payne, 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Martin Payne - we will DISMISS the pending pretrial motions relating to the plaintiffs prior complaint as moot, but without prejudice to renewal of these motions, once the plaintiff affects service of his amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on January 7, 2015. (kjn) (Main Document 28 replaced on 1/7/2015) (kjn).
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. On or before January 5, 2015, the plaintiff shall file a motion to amend his complaint, an accompanying brief, and a proposed amended complaint. 2. If the plaintiff does not move to amend his complain t by January 5, 2015, defendants will until January 19, 2015, to file briefs in support of their current pending motions, and further briefing of these motions shall then be conducted in accordance with the Rules of this Court. 3. If the Court denies plaintiffs motion to amend, defendants will have 14 days after that Order deny the motion to amend to file briefs in support of their current pending motions. 4. Since the status report filed by the parties reports that Pilchesky intends to amend hi s complaint to add the previously unknown defendants, whose identities have apparently been disclosed to him, and attempt to rectify any deficiencies in the previous complaints, Pilcheskys motion to compel disclosure of the identities of these deputy U.S. marshals, (Doc. 18.), is DISMISSED without prejudice as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on December 1, 2014. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
