Chung v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff: Leighton Chung
Defendant: Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv00490
Filed: March 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 77 OPINION AND ORDER - THAT: a. The settlement of this collective action is APPROVED as it represents afair and reasonable settlement of a bona fide dispute under the FLSA. b. The parties shall in good faith carry out all the terms of the Agreement. c. Without affecting the finality of the Judgment, the Court will retain jurisdiction over any disputes pertaining to the enforcement of the settlement. d. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. e.Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Untimely Consents (Doc. 64) is DENIED AS MOOT.f. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/15/15. (jfg)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification (Doc. 18) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED; to wit: 1. This action is conditionally certified, pursuant to Sect ion 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of the following collective: All sales employees (including, inter alia, Sales Representatives)1 employed by Defendant at the Wyndham Vacation Resorts Shawnee Village (lith e Shawnee Facility") during any workweek within the past three years. 2. Within seven (7) days after the entry of this Order, Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff a spreadsheet (preferably in Excel format) listing the name, last known address, a nd last known phone number of every individual falling within the collective, as defined in paragraph 1 above. 3. Within fourteen (14) days after the entry of this Order, Plaintiffs counsel will mail to all members of the collective the attached &quo t;Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit" form, the attached "Consent to Join" form, and a postage-paid return envelope bearing Plaintiffs counsel's address (collectively the "Notice Package"). 4. In order to participate in this action as an opt-in party plaintiff, recipients of the Notice Package must complete the uConsent to Join" form and return it in an envelope postmarked on or before the date falling fifty-six (56) days after the entry of this Order.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/9/14. (jfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chung v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leighton Chung
Represented By: Mark J. Gottesfeld
Represented By: R. Andrew Santillo
Represented By: Peter D. Winebrake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?