Alexander v. Rozum et al
| Keith Alexander |
| Gerald Rozum, Sylvia Gibson, Denise Thomas, Dascani, Richard S. Ellers, Joseph G. Fulginiti, C. Yackiel, Vincent T. Mooney, K. Leonard, Brian David, Confer and Kathryn B. McCarthy |
| 3:2014cv00678 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Northumberland |
| DB |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry).1.Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the Courts July 25, 2014, Memorandum and Order dismissing the above captioned action (Doc. 36), is DENIED.2.Plaintiffs motion to reinstate action (Doc. 38) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/8/15. (bs)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER TERMINATING CASE 1.The complaint is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1).2.Plaintiffs motions to appoint counsel, for service of the compl aint, and to compel discovery, (Doc. Nos. 6, 12, 15) are DISMISSED as moot. 3.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.4.Any appeal from this order will be deemed frivolous, not taken in good faith and lacking probable cause. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/25/14. (bs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
