Patel v. Kensol-Franklin, Inc.

Patel v. Kensol-Franklin, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Zaranaben S. Patel
Defendant:	Kensol-Franklin, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2014cv01439
Filed:	July 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Lehigh
Presiding Judge:	Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit:	Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 22, 2016	Filing 73 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)Based on the foregoing memorandum issued this day, the plaintiffs request for all documents in Leticas investigation report is GRANTED IN PART and Letica is directed to produce for the parti es all the photographs contained within its report on or before April 8, 2016. Plaintiffs request for all other documents in Leticas investigation report is DENIED.Additionally and as a follow up to the courts March 4, 2016 order (Doc. 71), on or before April 8, 2016, counsel are to submit to the court a joint proposed amended case management order, addressing reasonable extensions of the remaining deadlines. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/22/16. (bs)
September 11, 2015	Filing 49 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). For the reasons stated in the Memorandum entered this day in the above captioned case, the Plaintiffs motion to Quash, (Doc 45), is GRANTED.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/11/15. (bs)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 22, 2016

Filing 73 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)Based on the foregoing memorandum issued this day, the plaintiffs request for all documents in Leticas investigation report is GRANTED IN PART and Letica is directed to produce for the parti es all the photographs contained within its report on or before April 8, 2016. Plaintiffs request for all other documents in Leticas investigation report is DENIED.Additionally and as a follow up to the courts March 4, 2016 order (Doc. 71), on or before April 8, 2016, counsel are to submit to the court a joint proposed amended case management order, addressing reasonable extensions of the remaining deadlines. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/22/16. (bs)

September 11, 2015

Filing 49 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). For the reasons stated in the Memorandum entered this day in the above captioned case, the Plaintiffs motion to Quash, (Doc 45), is GRANTED.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/11/15. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel v. Kensol-Franklin, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zaranaben S. Patel
Represented By:	Robert J. Mongeluzzi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kensol-Franklin, Inc.
Represented By:	Eric A. Weiss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?