Harman v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Harman v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company

Harman v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company

Plaintiff:	James David Harman
Defendant:	Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
Case Number:	3:2014cv02014
Filed:	October 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Schuylkill
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Blewitt
Presiding Judge:	A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2015	Filing 17 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED.(2)The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.(3)The Clerk of Court is instructed to mark this case as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/27/15. (jam)
February 10, 2015	Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED.(2)Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED. (3)The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.(4)Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint to cure the defects identified in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). Should Plaintiff fail to amend within this period, his complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. (5)The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/6/15. (jam)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2015

Filing 17 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED.(2)The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.(3)The Clerk of Court is instructed to mark this case as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/27/15. (jam)

February 10, 2015

Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED.(2)Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED. (3)The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.(4)Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint to cure the defects identified in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). Should Plaintiff fail to amend within this period, his complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. (5)The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/6/15. (jam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harman v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James David Harman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
Represented By:	Jason G. Benion
Represented By:	Sarah C. Yerger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?