Wambold v. Varner et al
| Jason Wambold |
| Dorina Varner, William Dreibelis, Jon Fisher, Lynn Gonzalez, Ricaback, Zimmerly and William Almanshofer |
| 3:2014cv02206 |
| November 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), The claims against Remaining Defendants Gonzalez and Zimmerly are DISMISSED for failure to timely effectuate service.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.ORDER TERMINATING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/15/19. (bs)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Based on those factors and Plaintiffs failure to oppose this argument, it is clear that Plaintiffs vague contention of retaliation by Altmanshofer is not supported any facts which could establish t hat his exercise of a constitutionally protected right was a substantial or motivating factor behind the alleged acts of retaliation as required by Rauser. Therefore, entry of summary judgment is also appropriate with respect to the claim of retaliation against Altmanshofer. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 9/8/16. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
