Gonzalez v. Wentzel et al
| Gabriel Gonzalez |
| John E. Wentzel, Vincent Mooney and M. Moclock |
| 3:2015cv00184 |
| January 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)As such, under the standards announced in Durmer, the non-medical Commonwealth Defendants are entitled to summary judgment with respect to any claim of medical deliberate indifference. The unopposed motion for summary judgment will be granted. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 9/18/18. (cc)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Based upon those considerations, the motion to dismiss will be denied. An appropriate Order Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/18/16. (See Memo)(cc)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Pursuant to the above discussion, Plaintiff' s allegations at best set f orth a claim o f negligence against Doctor Moclock. However, allegations which sounds in negligence cannot be pursued under § 1983 under Durmer.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/10/16. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
