John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Schroeder et al
| John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) |
| Bertrand Albert Schroeder, Damon Bertrand King and Johnathan Vincent King |
| 3:2015cv00648 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER TERMINATING CASE. 1. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 42), is GRANTED.2. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of plaintiffs Damon Bertrand King and Johnathan Vincent King as the contingent beneficiaries of the death benefit of the Annuity, and against defendant Bertrand Albert Schroeder.3. The Clerk of Court shall direct payment, care of plaintiffs counsel, to plaintiff Damon Bertrand King, individually, and to plaintiff J ohnathan Vincent King, individually, the remaining balance of the Annuity proceeds deposited in the Registry of the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Each plaintiff is to receive an equal share of the Annuity proceeds.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/12/16. (bs)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff John Hancocks original request for entry of default and motion for discharge in interpleader, (Doc. 8), is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff John Hancocks amend ed request for entry of default, (Doc. 25), is GRANTED with respect to defendant Bertrand Albert Schroeder. The response to the plaintiffs complaint, (Doc. 22), filed by defendant Damon Bertrand King and defendant Johnathan Vincent King is accepted a s timely filed nunc pro tunc.DEFAULT IS HEREBY ENTERED AGAINST defendant Bertrand Albert Schroeder regarding plaintiff John Hancocks complaint, (Doc. 1).IT IS ALSO ORDERED THAT the plaintiff John Hancocks amended motion for discharge in interpleader, (Doc. 25), as to its complaint, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: plaintiff John Hancock, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, shall deposit the proceeds of the death benefit of the Annuity Contract No. 55004336 to the Registry of the Court, until the entry of a final judgment in this action and the expiration of any appeal period in connection therein; defendants are enjoined from commencing any actions against plaintiff John Hancock or asserting any claims in co nnection with the Annuity or related thereto; defendant Damon Bertrand King, individually, and as the POA of defendant Johnathan Vincent King, has interpleaded in this action a claim to the Annuity proceeds, and shall be the plaintiff herein; and pla intiff John Hancock is DISCHARGED from all liability in connection with, arising out of, or relating to the Annuity proceeds, subject only to its obligation to comply with any final, non-appealable judgment entered in this action.FINALLY, IT IS ORDER ED THAT after the Annuity proceeds are deposited into the Registry of the Court, plaintiff John Hancock is DISMISSED from this action. Damon Bertrand King, individually, and as the POA of Johnathan Vincent King, will then be docketed by the clerk of court as the plaintiff and Bertrand Albert Schroeder will be docketed as the defendant. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/8/15. (bs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
