McCausin v. Eckard et al
Donald J McCauslin |
J. Eckard and PA State Attorney General |
3:2015cv00982 |
May 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Huntingdon |
LQ |
Edwin M. Kosik |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 12 of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, DISMISSING McCauslin's petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 as MOOT, finding no basis to issue certificate of appealability, & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/8/17. (ki) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 2 Motion to Stay.1. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis(Doc. 3) is granted.2. Petitioners request that disposition of his pending habeascorpus petiti on be stayed (Doc. 2) is granted.3. Adjudication of Petitioners federal habeas corpus action isstayed.4. Within thirty (30) days of the termination of his state courtproceedings, Petitioner is directed to file a written statusreport with this court d etailing the conclusion of hisPennsylvania state court exhaustion efforts and including acopy of the relevant Superior and/or Supreme Courtsdisposition.5. For administrative purposes only, the Clerk of Court isdirected to mark this matter closed.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 5/27/2015 (bg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.