Hicks v. Warden
Petitioner: Clarence Hicks
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2016cv01515
Filed: July 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: PT
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE, for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/1/16. (jam)
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/20/2016. (c/m 7/21/2016 bas, Deputy Clerk) . [Transferred from Maryland on 7/22/2016.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clarence Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?