Nittany Outdoor Advertising et al v. College Township
Nittany Outdoor Advertising and Stephanas Ministries |
College Township |
4:2012cv00672 |
April 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Centre |
Christopher C. Conner |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER (MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry no. 81): DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion to Revise 69 and Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 71 . Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/8/16. (km) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/6/15. (km) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - RE: Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration 50 . Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/22/2014. (km) |
Filing 48 ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum, filed this same date as separate docket entry No. 47, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief 25 and 28 are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See Order for details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/20/14. (km) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying College Township's motion to quash for improper venue 15 . (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 1/15/13. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.