Montanez v. Missouri Basin Well Services

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Montanez v. Missouri Basin Well Services

Montanez v. Missouri Basin Well Services

Plaintiff:	Marissa M. Montanez
Defendant:	Missouri Basin Well Services
Case Number:	4:2014cv00553
Filed:	March 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Williamsport Office
County:	Lycoming
Presiding Judge:	Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 28, 2017	Filing 53 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the Defendant and close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/28/2017. (jn)
April 10, 2015	Filing 24 ORDER: In accotrdance with the MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry 23, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendant Missouri Basin Well Services' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 16 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The followi ng counts of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint are DISMISSED: Count II, Count III, and Count IV, and Plaintiff's request for punitive damages under the applicable federal statutes. The Court dismisses these counts WITHOUT PREJUDICE and grants Plaintiff leave to amend by 4/24/2015 the outlined deficiencies of her Complaint. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/10/15. (km)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 28, 2017

Filing 53 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the Defendant and close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/28/2017. (jn)

April 10, 2015

Filing 24 ORDER: In accotrdance with the MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry 23, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendant Missouri Basin Well Services' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 16 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The followi ng counts of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint are DISMISSED: Count II, Count III, and Count IV, and Plaintiff's request for punitive damages under the applicable federal statutes. The Court dismisses these counts WITHOUT PREJUDICE and grants Plaintiff leave to amend by 4/24/2015 the outlined deficiencies of her Complaint. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/10/15. (km)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montanez v. Missouri Basin Well Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marissa M. Montanez
Represented By:	Wayne A. Ely
Represented By:	W. Charles Sipio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Basin Well Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?