BRYAN, et al v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District BRYAN, et al v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al

BRYAN, et al v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al

Case Number:	1:2003cv00259
Filed:	August 12, 2003
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
Presiding Judge:	Maurice B. Cohill
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 17, 2014	Filing 435 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Granting 361 MOTION for Settlement to Satisfy Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 60 filed by RENIE SKALKO. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 10/14/2014. (nk)
March 22, 2012	Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Brigitte Sullivan, Paul Cancilla, and Carmen Merritt is GRANTED in its entirety and JUDGMENT is entered in their favor. It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Erie County Office of Children & Youth is GRANTED in its entirety and JUDGMENT is entered in its favor. It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Defendants Renie Skalko, Cindy Baxter, and Cindy Lewis as to Plaintiffs state law clai m of intentional infliction of emotional distress is GRANTED and JUDGMENT is entered in favor of these Defendants as to that claim. It is further hereby ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Defendants Renie Skalko, Cindy Baxter, and Cindy Lewis, is DENIED as to K.B.s substantive due process claim. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 3/22/2012. (rlh)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 17, 2014

Filing 435 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Granting 361 MOTION for Settlement to Satisfy Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 60 filed by RENIE SKALKO. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 10/14/2014. (nk)

March 22, 2012

Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Brigitte Sullivan, Paul Cancilla, and Carmen Merritt is GRANTED in its entirety and JUDGMENT is entered in their favor. It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Erie County Office of Children & Youth is GRANTED in its entirety and JUDGMENT is entered in its favor. It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Defendants Renie Skalko, Cindy Baxter, and Cindy Lewis as to Plaintiffs state law clai m of intentional infliction of emotional distress is GRANTED and JUDGMENT is entered in favor of these Defendants as to that claim. It is further hereby ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 142] on behalf of Defendants Renie Skalko, Cindy Baxter, and Cindy Lewis, is DENIED as to K.B.s substantive due process claim. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 3/22/2012. (rlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRYAN, et al v. ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?