HARRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00288
Filed: December 6, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
Presiding Judge: Sean J. McLaughlin
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 43 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate. AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 4/21/10.(jdg)
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 31 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2009, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This matter is dismissed. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 03/30/09. (jdg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?