HARRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
1:2006cv00288 |
December 6, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
Sean J. McLaughlin |
Taxes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 43 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate. AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 4/21/10.(jdg) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 31 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2009, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This matter is dismissed. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 03/30/09. (jdg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.