GOLD v. METZ LEWIS LAW FIRM, LLC et al
| DENNIS D. GOLD |
| METZ LEWIS LAW FIRM, LLC, STEVEN PETRIKIS, ESQUIRE, MICHAEL P. ROBIC, II, LEROY L. METZ, II, KEITH MARSHALL, JAMES HICKS, THE PAQUIN COMPANY, DARL E. WECKERLY, JOHN FREY and ELAINE H. FREY |
| 1:2008cv00207 |
| July 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Personal Property: Other Office |
| Venango |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 17th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of the Metz Lewis Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 32 , the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amen ded Complaint by Defendants The Paquin Company and James Hicks 36 , and Defendants John and H. Elaine Frey's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 38 , IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorand um Opinion, that said motions be, and hereby are, GRANTED as follows: 1.The Plaintiff's RICO claim under Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 2. The Plaintiff's state law breach of contract claim under Count II of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 02/17/2010. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
