SPECIALTY RETAILERS INC. v. BYZANTINE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INC. et al

Plaintiff: SPECIALTY RETAILERS INC.
Defendant: BYZANTINE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INC. and BYZANTINE INC.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00065
Filed: March 25, 2009
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Rent Lease & Ejectment Office
County: Elk
Presiding Judge: Sean J. McLaughlin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPECIALTY RETAILERS INC. v. BYZANTINE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SPECIALTY RETAILERS INC.
Represented By: Richard A. Lanzillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BYZANTINE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BYZANTINE INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.